msagara: (Default)
Michelle Sagara ([personal profile] msagara) wrote2007-03-27 09:55 pm

Wherein I go on a bit

I emailed in corrections to page-proofs for Cast in Secret today, and I would be feeling slightly virtuous about the fact that they actually got done if I hadn't spent quite so much time catching up on the after-affects of living life under a rock. But Adam Wilson, the long-suffering person to whom the task of levering such things out of me has gone, declared himself satisfied. So that's that book until August 2007.

I like the cover.

In book related news, Luna has bought 2 more novels, set in the same world, with the same characters, as the previous CAST books. The first book is tentatively titled Cast in Fury; I can't actually remember what the second of the two was tentatively titled – but I'm not so great with titles, so maybe that's for the best.


The aforementioned Rock I was living under? It's been really, really slow to shift, but it has moved (and I owe [livejournal.com profile] sdn email, and I'm working on it), enough so that I can cheerfully stroll the blogsphere again. It was pointed out to me what feels like weeks ago that John Scalzi had declared his intention to run for SFWA as president, or, as we like to call it in some circles, scapegoat, and I was curious about this. Curious enough to read his platform, and the platforms of the ticket that he felt he could not support. In general, I like a school of thought that substitutes complaining with action – and in general, if I do not feel that I can see a solution to a perceived problem, I try very hard not to complain; if I feel I can see a solution that I would be in all ways unwilling to sacrifice my time or money to address, I generally also try not to complain. Yes, I'm flawed. Yes, I complain. But let's stay for a moment in the realm of theoretical.

To call Mr. Scalzi's platform wildly optimistic is both accurate and cynical. But looking at what Mr. Scalzi manages to do with his time – his novel publishing schedule, his three blogs (three!), his various briefly mentioned non-fiction gigs, and his actually having a life – I'm not 100% sure that he couldn't accomplish some of what he intends in a meaningful time-frame. I think he actually has a clear idea of what kind of work this would be, and he's willing to try it anyway. I have no sense that he expects to get any significant cache out of it.

Michael Capobianco is the only presidential candidate on the ballot. It's probably not a huge secret that it's bloody hard to find some poor sod who has the time and energy to be available around the clock for free, and Capobianco has done solid and non-confrontational work for SFWA in the past in a variety of roles. Mr. Capobianco's running mate is Andrew Burt. Derryl Murphy has declared as the write-in candidate. eta: both Mr. Burt, who is on the ballot, and Mr. Murphy, who is not, are running for VP.

What is interesting to me, in the Scalzi toss of the hat, is his relative positioning. He doesn't spend a lot of his time over at sff.net in the SFWA area – but he spends more time than I think I have in a day on-line. He spends a crazy amount of time trawling the net and looking for things that are – in a word – cool. Cool things are often new technologies, or delivery systems – he was in the first wave of authors who put his novels up for free downloads. He's tried a bunch of different things – and he's not afraid to try a bunch more different things.

What he doesn't have is any real experience with the organization itself – and it's the organization that he's proposing to lead. Some will argue that this means he will either be forced to reinvent the wheel – because he won't know offhand what won't work – or he won't have the contacts and friends in the various committees to be able to get things done.

Maybe. But what he does have, at the moment, is an astonishing amount of good will and hope from the newer writers who've never become involved in SFWA because they felt it was either not relevant to them, or not up to speed with their medium (many of the writers who would qualify for active status as it currently stands have simply failed to join – for a variety of reasons. One, I think, is the growing importance of electronic markets, which Scalzi understands, and which many more traditionally minded SFWAns don't appear to. Check [livejournal.com profile] ksumnersmith's recent post for a solid example of exactly what I mean. No, I don't believe he paid her to write that. Joking. Just joking.)

What SFWA does need is some of that energy, some of that awareness of the SF publishing world that exists outside of its current boundaries. What it would benefit from immensely is Scalzi's high profile on-line, and his continuing ability to draw a crowd. These are things we probably can't buy – but if they're offered, we should think really, really hard about passing them up.

[identity profile] drenilop.livejournal.com 2007-03-28 06:26 pm (UTC)(link)
LOL :-) Whatever the reason, I'm glad to see it - yay for you and more for me! :-)

Do you have an estimated publishing date for HOUSE WAR 1 yet? My 'forthcoming fiction' list is getting a bit bare, and if I don't get something else new soon I may reach the state where I re-read Robert Jordan books....

[identity profile] falcongirl.livejournal.com 2007-03-28 06:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh hells, no! That's almost as bad as being consigned to re-reading Eddings, only longer and with less plot resolution per book. Do you need suggestions? Have you read Lynn Flewelling?
-T

[identity profile] drenilop.livejournal.com 2007-03-28 07:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I've actually not head of Flewelling. Can you make a suggestion where to start? Lately I've picked up (and discarded) Trudi Canavan (insufficient character development), Alma Alexander (4-5 books condensed into 2 with huge gaps), and Sharon Green (series incomplete/I've never seen someone work sex and promiscuous partnering into fantasy novels like that before). All in all I've had bad luck picking authors on my own lately.

... though, now, as I glance at the spines on the bookshelf beside me, all three of those complaints can probably be reduced to "EOS needs a better editor." Perhaps I should just avoid EOS?

[identity profile] falcongirl.livejournal.com 2007-03-28 07:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh yes. She has two same-world series, but the second set of books is a prequel-history that seemed to assume the later trilogy had been read first, as it seemed to assume that the reader would know more about the political undercurrents than were detailed.

Start with 'Luck in the Shadows' and read the Nightrunner series first. The prequel-history begins with 'The Bone Doll's Twin'. Flewelling was the author that was flung at me when I finished Michelle's books and George R.R. Martin had delayed 'Feast' again.

EOS has kind of been on a bad track lately. Kim Harrison is an amusing read, but it's fluffy and filled with vampiric UST and an abusive relationship that makes me want to smack the main character upside the head. Bujold's main character has settled into marital bliss and her secondary series just made me facepalm by the introduction of wolf spirit/human hybrid cliche, although she redeemed it.

-T
(Biblioaddict? Moi? .. maybe just a little.)

[identity profile] drenilop.livejournal.com 2007-04-02 01:14 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks... Turns out the local library HAS the set the begins with _Bone Doll_, but not the other, so I guess I'll be starting there anyway. :-) I'll manage. If I can get through Michelle's _Sun Sword_ series without having read the _Hunter_ pair, I think I can get through anything. LOL

I'll return the rec with Diana Pharoah Francis's _Path_ series. They're not high literature, and in points they go a bit fast for me, but for a first effort they're pretty good for a light read. And they're not EOS. :-)