Short of having numbers, no, not reliably. I have a very skewed perspective of what sells, because if we were to go by what sold for us, Terry Brooks (who is the nicest person you would want to meet) would no longer be published. In a brass tacks sort of way, the only thing that's relelvant to us is what does sell for us, and the various lists, etc., are about 50/50 in terms of hit and miss.
no subject
Date: 2006-10-21 03:29 am (UTC)