Date: 2008-02-29 10:29 am (UTC)
The problem is that a review requires at least some judgement, but also some sense of why the judgement is being made.

I've seen 'reviews' that just say: 'This is a great book. I loved every minute of it.' But that tells me nothing. What makes it great? Why do you love it? If the reviewer just went on to say: 'This is a great book. The romance between the main characters really worked for me. And the scene where they blow up the death star is hilarious. I loved every minute of it.' - that would be a review. Not a great review, but a review.

Similarly, half the capsule reviews you get in most papers these days consist of nothing more than a plot summary. That's a blurb, it might as well be ripped off from the back cover of the book. It does nothing as a review.

I don't mind being told that I'll love a book or that I'll hate it, but I want to know why you think I'll love it. It's that sense of context that I want.

And when you say: 'I want to couch a review in terms that the readers who (I think) will like the specific type of book I'm reviewing will recognize', that is precisely the provision of context I'm talking about.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

msagara: (Default)
Michelle Sagara

April 2015

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 17th, 2026 10:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios