Date: 2004-07-12 11:44 am (UTC)
If I think too much about process I can't do it. Can only really do that when I'm teaching--when I've switched sides of the brain and am approaching it analytically. I'm writing intuitively and if I pull back and get analytical, it kills the book.

And yet I outline especially with historicals, because events have to happen in a set order. However an intuitive thing often happens--something I'll add because it works turns out to have happened that way in reality, or else a character appears just when I need her and turns out to be just what she needs to be. (Happened in the mip in fact--thank goodness, too, because I needed to shift to female POV and, well, there she was, right in that abbey seven miles from Stonehenge.)

I tend to write tight--sometimes overly so--and have never had to cut. Always have to add. Scenes come through sharp and clear for the most part, and develop through dialogue, with bits of description--then the rest fits itself in. I have an awful time with exposition and time-setting and such--I mean who cares how many days went by between the last scene and this one? (My editor, of course. Aargh.) In a way it's odd I never got into play- or screenwriting.

[livejournal.com profile] aireon's first novel was a revelation to me--a completely different way of approaching the process. I well remember all that undergrowth, and the experience of hacking through it. 8)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

msagara: (Default)
Michelle Sagara

April 2015

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 11:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios