"And we are, of course, therefore talking about two different entities."
Yup, and that was the distinction I wanted to clarify - you said nothing about the book, and my response to papersky's comment about the book was strictly limited to the novel itself.
The book is definitely worth reading. Right now, in fact, it's seeming worth re-reading.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-22 04:56 am (UTC)Yup, and that was the distinction I wanted to clarify - you said nothing about the book, and my response to papersky's comment about the book was strictly limited to the novel itself.
The book is definitely worth reading. Right now, in fact, it's seeming worth re-reading.