Because I'm sometimes overfocused
Sep. 26th, 2004 08:31 pm... and I'd finished GOING POSTAL, Pratchett's latest novel, and I had reread all of the Watch novels in chronological order and was left with that slightly empty feeling one gets when one hasn't quite finished but there's nothing left to finish, I suddenly remembered that Google Is Our Friend, and, in an act much less lazy than is my wont, dug up a few words from alt.fan.pratchett, posted by the author in question.
"All this being said, at the recent DWcon I did a reading on the Friday
night and gave the audience a choice between part of the next adult
novel ( a Watch novel) and the next Tiffany/Feegle novel. They both got
loud cheers, but the latter's cheer was perceptibly louder. Maybe
there are two roads now."
I'm so excited :D. New Watch novel!
ETA: The new working titles, according to the site that
tenebris so kindly pointed out are:
WINTERSMITH (Tiffany novel)
THUD (Watch novel)
"All this being said, at the recent DWcon I did a reading on the Friday
night and gave the audience a choice between part of the next adult
novel ( a Watch novel) and the next Tiffany/Feegle novel. They both got
loud cheers, but the latter's cheer was perceptibly louder. Maybe
there are two roads now."
I'm so excited :D. New Watch novel!
ETA: The new working titles, according to the site that
WINTERSMITH (Tiffany novel)
THUD (Watch novel)
no subject
Date: 2004-09-28 07:20 pm (UTC)YES! Exactly. While I enjoy early Pratchett (well, not a huge fan of Rincewind, but...), I truly love later Pratchett. Thief of Time, Carpe Jugulum, and Night Watch all left me in a state of...awe, almost, and I had to go back and read what I had not-quite-missed before.
One of the interesting things about Pratchett is that his characters seem to evolve not just in the books, but between them as well. It's something I only noticed when I went back and reread each book in the Watch series, but the Sam Vimes of Guards! Guards! and Men at Arms have interesting, subtle differences (which, of course, I cannot detail at this time). And this makes sense, though in another writer, I might find it disconcerting.