msagara: (Default)
I'm going to Tempe for the World Fantasy Convention this year. I'm going to arrive at 9:24 a.m. Since it's my firm belief that in a kind universe, no one would actually be awake at 9:24 a.m. (and yes, this does make my belief in the kindess of the universe a tad on the shaky side overall), I'm not really looking forward to getting to the airport. As in, on time. As in, while they'll still let me on the plane.

Assuming I'm awake enough to stand in the right line.

It occurs to me that I should clarify things a bit. Which usually happens when I'm off in rant territory <wry g>.
I love book related LJs and blogs )

Is anyone here going to be at the World Fantasy Convention?

A rant

Oct. 24th, 2004 08:53 pm
msagara: (Default)
And my rant for the day. Which I'm trying not to turn into a rant, because it didn't start out that way.

Elsewhere on LJ, while looking at the small interest list of people who list Eva Ibbotson -- who has become a staple in my comfort reading list -- I happened upon a post about Amazon.com and its review system.
Really a rant about Internet anonymity, tangentially related to amazon.com )
msagara: (Default)
[livejournal.com profile] stakebait wrote
Been thinking more about this. What makes it [fanfic] not public is the attempt to fly under the radar of the Powers That Be, right? Or at least not actively draw their attention? Though how much that's done varies quite a bit from creator to creator. I know of at least one mailing list, read and posted to by the author, where fanfic is simply labeled "fanfic" so she can avoid reading it, but there's no attempt to pretend that it doesn't exist.

I've been thinking more about it as well. This is less an answer to your question than it started out being, but it is a more methodical examination of my own reaction.
More thoughts on fanfiction )
msagara: (Default)
Some time ago, during the discussions inevitably caused by the Anne Rice debacle, I said that I would discuss my views on fanfic. I've been thinking about this in bits and pieces since that point, because I have two views about it (generally, I have at least two about almost everything, except perhaps for the upcoming US election, and I will fail to discuss the single view I have because I'm not a US citizen).

My personal view -- and by personal I mean it is a view which pertains only to such things as they affect me -- first. So everything I say for the next few paragraphs is specifically about my work, or responses to my work.
my take on fanfic )
msagara: (Default)
This has been a torment for me; I've so enjoyed everyone else's, but I can't pick one thing, and even clipping one part of one thing in a reasonable fashion fills me with the certainty that I'm a vandal. So I picked three that had a profound effect on me.
poetry meme )
msagara: (Default)
Okay.

I signed the contract that, in bits and pieces, I typed in over the course of the last month or two (thank you for your restraint vis a vis typos <wry g>. And then I waited.

A lot of that waiting, in this business. Nothing is read quickly, unless for some reason you're pressing up against a production deadline, in which case there's severe anxiety and a sense of doom and dread that properly belongs in a Lovecraft pastiche. But I digress. After the book was sold, I was then asked to edit it. Which I did. The editing was much easier for me than the initial writing had been. This has always been true, with the single exception of my third published novel, which was a "pitch out and start over". Edits finished, I sent it back. And waited.
What happened after signing the contract )

Any questions?
msagara: (Default)
Back on GEnie, we defined a novel as an attack novel if it had an incredible amount of momentum that made it impossible to not write. As you can imagine, this was -- and is -- an incredibly satisfying state to be in when breaking draft.

Cast in Courtlight (and yes, I know the latter isn't a real word, but it's a fantasy), is like that at the moment. Which is good, as it stops me from hovering on the phone and complaining at all hours to my ISP. Which is, once again, down. And has been for several hours. I'm logging in via someone else's connection, and I hate doing that. I'd rather have the television or the telephone die completely than lose my internet connection. Go geeks.

I've been thinking a bit about why this book is different from, say, HOUSE WAR, which is (was; I'm writing to Luna deadline at the moment) progressing at a much slower rate, and wanted to talk about it a bit here -- which means I'm putting off the round-up for another post.
language of story )
msagara: (Default)
I've been absent. My internet service provider is trying to give me an ulcer. My email has been done via an ancient dial-up, and I'm behind, oh, about a week, which in LJ terms is almost forever.

They're replacing wires and other junk now, and at the moment, we're up. So I'm sneaking in to tell you all that I'm working on the round-up of the post-contract stuff now, and I hope to post it here in the next little while <crossing fingers>.

In other news: HOUSE WAR will be 2 books (everyone who reads me, try to look surprised), and the second Luna novel is being fun. Fun is good.
msagara: (Default)
The rest of the contract (I have been: allergic, premenstrual and very, very cranky. The usual solution to this is to read Terry Pratchett. So I've reread every single Pratchett I own that isn't a Rincewind novel, and then every single Pratchett I owned that I'd been holding out on for just this kind of mood.)

ETA: The rest, as in, all but the last four clauses, because this was already too long.

really boring clauses )
msagara: (Default)
And now: a rant.

(I'll get back to the contract, which is now entirely boring bits that are almost irrelevant, after this).

The Washington Post ran this article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45761-2004Sep23.html

It's about self-publishing.
Why this is a bad idea )
msagara: (Default)
... and I'd finished GOING POSTAL, Pratchett's latest novel, and I had reread all of the Watch novels in chronological order and was left with that slightly empty feeling one gets when one hasn't quite finished but there's nothing left to finish, I suddenly remembered that Google Is Our Friend, and, in an act much less lazy than is my wont, dug up a few words from alt.fan.pratchett, posted by the author in question.

Brief mention of the subject of his next two books )
msagara: (Default)
This was actually very interesting (after I'd been around the blocks a few times), because this has the least restrictive boilerplate, or even haggled down, reversion clause I've ever seen.

Discontinuance of Publication
Reversion clause etc. )
msagara: (Default)
Because you've all been patient while I slip sideways into the world of <ahem> literary criticism:

This one causes people stress. Therefore it's worth looking at.

Option for Next Work
The Option Clause )
msagara: (Default)
[livejournal.com profile] astolat wrote haven't read the fandom_wank response in particular, if that happens to be what mainly inspired this post, because in general I find f_w to be kind of disquietingly mob-like even when it's funny. But I have to say I'm on board with everything flummery said, and I do understand the general wave of hostile response.

Yes, it was the f_w board that I found unsettling.
clips from amazon.com Neanderthal reviews & more )
msagara: (Default)
Did I mention Indemnity clauses?

Indemnity clause )
msagara: (Default)
I've actually been writing review column, which is why this has been a bit delayed. And pondering structure and things that work or don't in books that I've picked up and put down in general for this particular column, which tends to eat my brain.

But… this is probably the last of the interesting bits. The part that will follow this is indemnity, which sounds horrible to read. Because it is.

Contract clauses 11 and 12 )
msagara: (Default)
I'd like to take a brief break to answer a couple of questions. Why? Because I'm tired of the strict character limit response to threaded comments.
Read more... )

ETA: And one more:

Read more... )
msagara: (Default)
Now we get to clause 9 & 10. These are probably the clauses that everyone is curious about. Well, okay, more curious about.

So… in order to keep you all in suspense, I'm going to go on a bit about why I'm actually doing this. One: Because I want to. Two: Because contracts are something we all talk around as if they were somehow vaguely unseemly -- we can use innuendo, but not hard fact. I understand this. I even understand why, to a certain extent, this is true. It's very, very hard for FTN not to compare him or herself to other FTNs. If things are vague, and numbers aren't mentioned, than some useful information can be exchanged, but no one is crabbing. But the usefulness of that information?
Contract clauses 9 & 10 )
Page generated Feb. 13th, 2026 02:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios